Blacklists vs. MFAs

Blacklists vs. MFAs

Good news for those who dislike MFA: DSPs can automatically block sites made for advertising if needed.

Made-for-Advertising (MFA) — are sites created with the sole purpose of generating advertising revenue. They often contain minimal original content but are filled with numerous ads to maximize profits. Various methods may be used to drive traffic and ensure high ad visibility, but user interaction on such sites is typically poor.

AdLib DSP announced on August 14th a partnership with Jounce Media. The goal of the partnership is to ensure the cleanliness of the ad inventory purchased through the AdLib platform from MFA sites and to expand AdLib's capabilities in working with curated auctions.

Jounce Media specializes in analyzing and optimizing the programmatic sales chain. The company focuses on evaluating traffic quality, identifying and excluding MFA sites, and helping platforms and advertisers improve the quality of purchased inventory. Jounce Media provides blocklists and whitelists that allow clients to choose higher-quality ad placements and avoid low-quality or fraudulent sites.

AdLib's founder and CEO, Mike Hauptman, stated that the partnership with Jounce Media would make MFA blocking tools more accessible to mid-sized advertisers. This capability is now offered as a free addition to the overall offering.

AdLib is a self-serve advertising inventory purchasing platform designed to simplify the management of ad campaigns. Unlike traditional DSPs, AdLib offers an intuitive interface that allows users with little technical knowledge to set up and manage their campaigns. The main difference with AdLib is the availability of additional tools. AdLib also integrates with DSPs, providing a more flexible and convenient ad buying process without the need for agency services or external specialists.

AdLib and Jounce Media Unite Against MFA

According to Jounce Media's founder Chris Kane, most MFA blocking solutions operate on a CPM basis, charging for the number of checks, which is usually unaffordable for mid-sized advertisers.

Additionally, as a buy-side solution that works as an additional layer on top of DSP integrations, AdLib can block MFA regardless of whether the DSP intermediary is proactively filtering it.

Lists

Jounce, a leader in the fight against MFA sites, offers its own blocklist of sites that meet its MFA criteria.

These criteria are designed to identify publishers who primarily attract paid traffic and have a high ad-to-content ratio on their sites.

Main characteristics of MFA sites:

  • Many banner ads and little content.
  • Main traffic source — paid channels.
  • Non-original content.
  • Multiple redirects.
  • Template design with minimal changes.

AdLib uses the Jounce list for all campaigns on its platform. This exclusion list is enabled by default, but buyers can request it to be disabled, Hauptman noted.

Instead of blocking individual pages of a site, Jounce's exclusion list operates at the domain level. However, in response to cases like the situation with Forbes, which had a hidden MFA subdomain, Jounce aims to better catch subdomains associated with activities falling under the MFA definition.

How such lists are created:

  • Traffic analysis. Services collect traffic data from various sites to understand where visitors are coming from. Sites with a disproportionately large volume of paid traffic (e.g., through ads or redirects) often raise suspicions.
  • Scanning and parsing content. Specialized algorithms scan web pages, analyzing the number of ad blocks compared to content.
  • Analysis of user behavior patterns. Monitoring systems track how users interact with the site. Short time on site, high bounce rates, and frequent transitions to ad pages can indicate a potential MFA site.
  • Using machine learning. Machine learning algorithms are trained on existing MFA site data and can detect new sites by analyzing similar patterns and anomalies in site behavior and content.
In Search of MFA

To remain relevant, Jounce and AdLib update their exclusion lists daily. They also remove sites from the list that were mistakenly flagged or have corrected the reasons why they were classified as MFA.

MFA: Current Status

The widespread use of such tools helps reduce ad budgets spent on MFA sites and redirects them to more deserving publishers.

Such initiatives have already contributed to reducing spending on MFA sites. According to Jounce's research, budgets spent on MFA sites peaked at 30% of the total in the USA in July 2023, but have since dropped to 10%.

However, according to Kane, this 10% figure can vary significantly across different DSPs. And while the overall share of MFA in ad budgets is decreasing, every tenth ad request still comes from such sites.

Ultimately, MFA sites exist because SSPs keep them in the sales chain.

MFA Blacklists

Why MFA Sites in Publishers' Portfolios May Be Beneficial for SSPs?

  • Increasing inventory volume. SSPs earn commissions from the sale of ad impressions. MFA sites generate a large number of impressions, increasing the total inventory volume for sale and SSP revenue.
  • Higher margins. SSPs can earn higher profits from MFA sites because these sites usually require less maintenance and invest less in quality content. This allows SSPs to achieve higher margins on ad sales.
  • Filling low-quality inventory. MFA sites allow SSPs to place ads that are difficult to display on higher-quality platforms. This helps SSPs maintain a high fill rate for ad slots, even if the quality of this inventory is lower.
  • Retaining advertisers. While many advertisers avoid MFA sites, some may be less demanding or unaware of the difference in inventory quality. This allows SSPs to offer a wider range of advertising opportunities and retain advertisers seeking low-cost ads without considering site quality.

But the technology works so that DSPs limit the number of requests that SSPs can send them per second, says Kane (I recently wrote about QPS). Therefore, if buyers use solutions like AdLib's to block MFA sites, SSPs will eventually notice that DSPs are no longer buying as many MFA impressions as before and will start sending more impressions from vetted publishers.

All Publishers Matter

Alternative Opinion

Despite the negative perception of MFA sites in the industry, it cannot be denied that these sites often have a real audience. Although the content and environment on these sites may not meet advertisers' expectations, and users may land on pages accidentally or even against their will, these sites continue to monetize by attracting real users.

Verifiers play a key role in ensuring that advertisers do not buy bot-generated traffic and ideally should prevent the purchase of fake impressions. If verifiers do their job correctly, buying an audience on MFA sites can be more cost-effective than on more traditional platforms. Thus, if your goal is to reach a specific audience and you are confident in its authenticity, purchasing ads on an MFA site may be a reasonable and profitable decision, allowing you to save your budget.

Other Materials on This Topic